(Test Bank) Intermediate Microeconomics with Calculus: A Modern Approach: Media Update

Varian, 1

Business

Test Bank

1st Edition

• $15.00 $50.00

---

Description

Test Bank for Intermediate Microeconomics with Calculus: A Modern Approach: Media Update, The downloadable file consists of 577 pages, and the total size of the file is 2.03 MB. Purchase now only for highly discounted price.

Author(s): Varian

---

---

Study Note Preview

Chapter 1 1 Chapter 1 The Market This chapter was written so I would have something to talk about on the first day of class. I wanted to give students an idea of what economics was all about, and what my lectures would be like, and yet not have anything that was really critical for the course. (At Michigan, students are still shopping around on the first day, and a good number of them won’t necessarily be at the lecture.) I chose to discuss a housing market since it gives a way to describe a number of economic ideas in very simple language and gives a good guide to what liesahead. In this chapter I was deliberately looking for surprising results —analytic insights that wouldn’t arise from “just thinking” about a problem. The twomost surprising results that I presented are the condominium example and thetaxexampleinSection1.6. Itisworthemphasizinginclassjustwhytheseresults are true, and how they illustrate the power of economic modeling. It also makes sense to describe their limitations. Suppose that every con- dominium conversion involved knocking out the walls and creating two apart- ments. Then what would happen to the price of apartments? Suppose that the condominiums attracted suburbanites who wouldn’t otherwise consider rentingan apartment. In each of these cases, the price of remaining apartments would rise when condominium conversion took place. The point of a simple economic model of the sort considered here is to focus our thoughts on what the relevant effects are, not to come to a once-and-for-allconclusion about the urban housing market. The real insight that is offered by these examples is that you have to consider both the supply andthe demand side of the apartment market when you analyze the impact of this particular policy. The only concept that the students seem to have trouble with in this chapter is the idea of Pareto efficiency. I usually talk about the idea a little more than is in the book and rephrase it a few times. But then I tell them not to worryabout it too much, since we’ll look at it in great detail later in the course. Theworkbook problems herearepretty straightforward. The biggest problem is getting the students to draw the true (discontinuous) demand curve, as inFigure 1.1, rather than just to sketch in a downward-sloping curve as in Figure 1.2. This is a good time to emphasize to the students that when they are given numbersdescribingacurve, theyhavetousethenumbers—theycan’tjustsketchin any old shape.2Chapter Highlights The Market A. Example of an economic model — the market for apartments 1. models are simplifications of reality 2. for example, assume all apartments are identical 3. some are close to the university, others are far away 4. price of outer-ring apartments is exogenous — determined outside the model 5. price of inner-ring apartments is endogenous — determined within the model B. Two principles of economics 1.optimization principle —peoplechooseactionsthatareintheirinterest 2.equilibrium principle — people’s actions must eventually be consistent with each other C. Constructing the demand curve 1. line up the people by willingness-to-pay. See Figure 1.1.2. for large numbers of people, this is essentially a smooth curve as in Figure 1.2. D. Supply curve 1. depends on time frame 2. but we’ll look at the short run — when supply of apartments is fixed. E. Equilibrium 1. when demand equals supply2. price that clears the market F. Comparative statics 1. how does equilibrium adjust when economic conditions change? 2. “comparative” — compare two equilibria3. “statics” — only look at equilibria, not at adjustment 4. example — increase in supply lowers price; see Figure 1.5. 5. example — create condos which are purchased by renters; no effect on price; see Figure 1.6. G. Other ways to allocate apartments 1. discriminating monopolist 2. ordinary monopolist 3. rent control H. Comparing different institutions 1. need a criterion to compare how efficient these different allocation methods are. 2. an allocation is Pareto efficient if there is no way to make some group of people better off without making someone else worse off. 3. if something is notPareto efficient, then there issome way to make some people better off without making someone else worse off. 4. if something is not Pareto efficient, then there is some kind of “waste” in the system. I. Checking efficiency of different methods 1. free market — efficient 2. discriminating monopolist — efficient 3. ordinary monopolist — not efficient4. rent control — not efficientChapter 1 3 J. Equilibrium in long run 1. supply will change 2. can examine efficiency in this context as well4Chapter Highlights Chapter 2 Budget Constraint Most of the material here is pretty straightforward. Drive home the formula for the slope of the budget line, emphasizing the derivation on page 23. Try some different notation to make sure that they see the ideaof the budget line, and don’t just memorize the formulas. In the workbook, we use a number ofdifferent choices of notation for precisely this reason. It is also worth pointing out that the slope of a line depends on the (arbitrary) choice of which variable is plotted on the vertical axis. It is surprising how often confusion arises on this point. Students sometimes have problems with the idea of a numeraire good. They understand the algebra, but they don’t understand when it would be used. Onenice example is in foreign currency exchange. If you have English pounds and American dollars, then you can measure the total wealth that you have in eitherdollars or pounds by choosing one or the other of the two goods as numeraire. In the workbook, students sometimes get thrown in exercises where one of the goods has a negative price, so the budget line has a positive slope. Thiscomes from trying to memorize formulas and figures rather than thinking about the problem. This is a good exercise to go over in order to warn students about the dangers of rote learning! Budget Constraint A. Consumer theory: consumers choose the best bundles of goods they can afford. 1. this is virtually the entire theory in a nutshell 2. but this theory has many surprising consequences B. Two parts to theory 1. “can afford” — budget constraint 2. “best” — according to consumers’ preferencesChapter 2 5 C. What do we want to do with the theory? 1. test it — see if it is adequate to describe consumer behavior 2. predict how behavior changes as economic environment changes 3. use observed behavior to estimate underlying values a) cost-benefit analysis b) predicting impact of some policy D. Consumption bundle 1. (x1,x2) — how much of each good is consumed 2. (p1,p2) — prices of the two goods 3.m— money the consumer has to spend 4. budget constraint: p1x1+p2x2≤m 5. all (x1,x2) that satisfy this constraint make up the budget set of the consumer. See Figure 2.1. E. Two goods 1. theory works with more than two goods, but can’t draw pictures. 2. often think of good 2 (say) as a composite good, representing money to spend on other goods. 3. budget constraint becomes p1x1+x2≤m. 4. money spent on good 1 (p 1x1) plus the money spent on good 2 (x 2)h a s to be less than or equal to the amount available ( m). F. Budget line 1.p1x1+p2x2=m 2. also written as x2=m/p 2−(p1/p2)x1. 3. budget line has slope of −p1/p2and vertical intercept of m/p 2. 4. setx1= 0 to find vertical intercept (m/p 2); setx2= 0 to find horizontal intercept (m/p 1). 5. slope of budget line measures opportunity cost of good 1 — how much of good 2 you must give up in order to consume more of good 1. G. Changes in budget line 1. increasing mmakes parallel shift out. See Figure 2.2. 2. increasing p1makes budget line steeper. See Figure 2.3. 3. increasing p2makes budget line flatter 4. just see how intercepts change 5. multiplying all prices by tis just like dividing income by t 6. multiplying all prices and income by tdoesn’t change budget line a) “a perfectly balanced inflation doesn’t change consumption possibili- ties” H. The numeraire 1. canarbitrarilyassignonepriceavalueof1andmeasureotherpricerelative to that 2. useful when measuring relative prices; e.g., English pounds per dollar, 1987 dollars versus 1974 dollars, etc. I. Taxes, subsidies, and rationing 1. quantity tax — tax levied on units bought: p1+t 2. value tax — tax levied on dollars spent: p1+τp1. Also known as ad valorem tax 3. subsidies — opposite of a tax a)p1−s b) (1−σ)p16Chapter Highlights 4. lump sum tax or subsidy — amount of tax or subsidy is independent of the consumer’s choices. Also called a head tax or a poll tax 5. rationing — can’t consume more than a certain amount of some good J. Example — food stamps 1. before 1979 was an ad valorem subsidy on food a) paid a certain amount of money to get food stamps which were worth more than they cost b) some rationing component — could only buy a maximum amount of food stamps 2. after 1979 got a straight lump-sum grant of food coupons. Not the same as a pure lump-sum grant since could only spend the coupons on food.Chapter 3 7 Chapter 3 Preferences This chapter is more abstract and therefore needs somewhat more motivation than the previous chapters. It might be a good idea to talk about relations in general before introducing the particular idea of preference relations. Try the relations of “taller,” and “heavier,” and “taller and heavier.” Point out that “taller and heavier” isn’t a complete relation, while the other two are. This general discussion can motivate the general idea of preference relations. Make sure that the students learn the specific examples of preferences such as perfect substitutes, perfect complements, etc. They will use these examplesmany, many times in the next few weeks! When describing the ideas of perfect substitutes, emphasize that the defining characteristic is that the slope of the indifference curves is constant, not that itis−1. In the text, I always stick with the case where the slope is −1, but in the workbook, we often treat the general case. The same warning goes with the perfect complements case. I work out the symmetric case in the text and try to get the students to do the asymmetric case in the workbook. The definition of the marginal rate of substitution is fraught with “sign confusion.” Should the MRSbe defined as a negative or a positive number? I’ve chosentogivethe MRSitsnaturalsigninthebook, butIwarnthestudentsthat manyeconomiststendtospeakofthe MRSintermsofabsolutevalue. Example: diminishing marginal rate of substitution refers to a situation where the absolute valueof theMRSdecreases as we move along an indifference curve. The actual value of the MRS(a negative number) is increasing in this movement! Students often begin to have problems with the workbook exercises here. The first confusion they have is that they get mixed up about the idea that indifference curves measure the directions where preferences are constant, and instead draw lines that indicate the directions that preferences are increasing.The second problem that they have is in knowing when to draw just arbitrary curves that qualitatively depict some behavior or other, and when to draw exact shapes. Try asking your students to draw their indifference curves between five dollar bills and one dollar bills. Offer to trade with them based on what they draw. Inaddition to getting them to think, this is a good way to supplement your facultysalary.8Chapter Highlights Preferences A. Preferences are relationships between bundles. 1. if a consumer would choose bundle ( x1,x2)w h e n(y1,y2) is available, then it is natural to say that bundle ( x1,x2) is preferred to (y 1,y2)b yt h i s consumer. 2. preferences have to do with the entire bundleof goods, not with individual goods. B. Notation 1. (x1,x2)/follows(y1,y2) means the x-bundle is strictly preferred to the y- bundle 2. (x1,x2)∼(y1,y2) means that the x-bundle is regarded as indifferent to the y-bundle 3. (x1,x2)/followsequal(y1,y2) means the x-bundle is at least as good as (preferred to or indifferent to) the y-bundle C. Assumptions about preferences 1. complete — any two bundles can be compared 2. reflexive — any bundle is at least as good as itself 3. transitive — if X/followsequalYandY/followsequalZ,t h e nX/followsequalZ a) transitivity necessary for theory of optimalchoice D. Indifference curves 1. graph the set of bundles that are indifferent to some bundle. See Figure 3.1. 2. indifference curves are like contour lines on a map 3. note that indifference curves describing two distinct levels of preference cannot cross. See Figure 3.2. a) proof — use transitivity E. Examples of preferences 1. perfect substitutes. Figure 3.3. a) red pencils and blue pencils; pints and quarts b) constant rate of trade-off between the two goods 2. perfect complements. Figure 3.4. a) always consumed together b) right shoes and left shoes; coffee and cream 3. bads. Figure 3.5.4. neutrals. Figure 3.6.5. satiation or bliss point Figure 3.7. F. Well-behaved preferences 1. monotonicity — more of either good is better a) implies indifference curves have negative slope. Figure 3.9. 2. convexity — averages are preferred to extremes. Figure 3.10. a) slope gets flatter as you move further to right b) example of non-convex preferences G. Marginal rate of substitution 1. slope of the indifference curve2.MRS=Δx 2/Δx 1along an indifference curve. Figure 3.11. 3. sign problem — natural sign is negative, since indifference curves will generally have negative slope 4. measures how the consumer is willing to trade off consumption of good 1 for consumption of good 2. Figure 3.12.Chapter 3 9 5. measures marginal willingness to pay (give up) a) not the same as how much you have to pay b) but how much you would be willingto pay10Chapter Highlights Chapter 4 Utility Inthischapter, thelevelofabstractionkicksupanothernotch. Studentsoften have trouble with the idea of utility. It is sometimes hard for trained economists to sympathize with them sufficiently, since it seems like such an obvious notion to us. Here is a way to approach the subject. Suppose that we return to the idea of the “heavier than” relation discussed in the last chapter. Think of having a bigbalance scale with two trays. You can put someone on each side of the balance scale and see which person is heavier, but you don’t have any standardizedweights. Nevertheless you have a way to determine whether xis heavier than y. Now suppose that you decide to establish a scale. You get a bunch of stones, check that they are all the same weight, and then measure the weight of individuals in stones. It is clear that xis heavier than yifx’s weight in stones is heavier than y’s weight in stones. Somebodyelsemightusedifferentunitsofmeasurements—kilograms, pounds, or whatever. It doesn’t make any difference in terms of deciding who is heavier. At this point it is easy to draw the analogy with utility—just as pounds givea way to represent the “heavier than” order numerically, utility gives a way to represent the preference order numerically. Just as the units of weight are arbitrary, so are the units of utility. This analogy can also be used to explore the concept of a positive monotonic transformation, a concept that students have great trouble with. Tell them thata monotonic transformation is just like changing units of measurement in theweight example. However, it is also important for students to understand that nonlinear changes of units are possible. Here is a nice example to illustrate this. Supposethat wood is always sold in piles shaped like cubes. Think of the relation “one pile has more wood than another.” Then you can represent this relation by looking at the measure of the sides of the piles, the surface area of the piles, or the volume of the piles. That is, x,x 2,o rx3gives exactly the same comparison between the piles. Each of these numbers is a different representation of the utility of a cube of wood. Be sure to go over carefully the examples here. The Cobb-Douglas example is an important one, since we use it so much in the workbook. Emphasize that it is just a nice functional form that gives convenient expressions. Be sure toChapter 4 11 elaborate onthe ideathat xa 1xb2is thegeneralformfor Cobb-Douglas preferences, but various monotonic transformations (e.g., the log) can make it look quite different. It’s a good idea to calculate the MRSfor a few representations of the Cobb-Douglas utility function in class so that people can see how to do them and, more importantly, that the MRSdoesn’t change as you change the representation of utility. The example at the end of the chapter, on commuting behavior, is a very nice one. If you present it right, it will convince your students that utility is an operationalconcept. Talkabouthowthesamemethodscanbeusedinmarketing surveys, surveys of college admissions, etc. The exercises in the workbook for this chapter are very important since they drive home the ideas. A lot of times, students thinkthat they understand some point, but they don’t, and these exercises will point that out to them. It is a good idea to let the students discover for themselves that a sure-fire way to tell whether one utility function represents the same preferences as another is tocompute the two marginal rate of substitution functions. If they don’t get this idea on their own, you can pose it as a question and lead them to the answer. Utility A. Two ways of viewing utility 1. old way a) measures how “satisfied” you are 1) not operational 2) many other problems 2. new way a) summarizes preferences b) a utility function assigns a number to each bundle of goods so that more preferred bundles get higher numbers c) that is, u(x 1,x2)>u(y1,y2) if and only if (x 1,x2)/follows(y1,y2) d) only the ordering of bundles counts, so this is a theory of ordinal utility e) advantages 1) operational 2) gives a complete theory of demand B. Utility functions are not unique 1. ifu(x1,x2)isautilityfunctionthatrepresentssomepreferences, and f(·)is any increasing function, then f(u(x1,x2)) represents the same preferences 2. why? Because u(x1,x2)>u(y1,y2)o n l yi ff (u(x1,x2))>f(u(y1,y2)) 3. so ifu(x1,x2) is a utility function then any positive monotonic transfor- mation of it is also a utility function that represents the same preferences C. Constructing a utility function 1. can do it mechanically using the indifference curves. Figure 4.2. 2. can do it using the “meaning” of the preferences D. Examples 1. utility to indifference curves a) easy — just plot all points where the utility is constant 2. indifference curves to utility3. examples a) perfect substitutes — all that matters is total number of pencils, so u(x 1,x2)=x 1+x2does the trick12Chapter Highlights 1) can use any monotonic transformation of this as well, such as log (x1+x2) b) perfect complements — what matters is the minimum of the left and right shoes you have, so u(x1,x2)=m i n{x1,x2}works c) quasilinear preferences — indifference curves are vertically parallel. Figure 4.4. 1) utility function has form u(x1,x2)=v(x1)+x 2 d) Cobb-Douglas preferences. Figure 4.5. 1) utility has form u(x1,x2)=xb 1xc2 2) convenient to take transformation f(u)=u1 b+cand write xb b+c 1xc b+c 2 3) orxa 1x1−a 2,w h e r ea =b/(b+c) E. Marginal utility 1. extra utility from some extra consumption of one of the goods, holding the other good fixed 2. this is a derivative, but a special kind of derivative — a partialderivative 3. this just means that you look at the derivative of u(x1,x2) keeping x2fixed — treating it like a constant 4. examples a) ifu(x1,x2)=x1+x2,t h e nMU 1=∂u/∂x 1=1 b) ifu(x1,x2)=xa 1x1−a 2,t h e nMU 1=∂u/∂x 1=axa−1 1x1−a 2 5. note that marginal utility depends on which utility function you choose to represent preferences a) if you multiply utility times 2, you multiply marginal utility times 2 b) thus it is not an operational concept c) however, MUiscloselyrelatedto MRS,whichisanoperationalconcept 6. relationship between MUandMRS a)u(x1,x2)=k,w h e r ek is a constant, describes an indifference curve b) we want to measure slope of indifference curve, the MRS c) so consider a change ( dx1,dx 2) that keeps utility constant. Then MU 1dx1+MU 2dx2=0 ∂u ∂x1dx1+∂u ∂x2dx2=0 d) hence dx2 dx1=−MU 1 MU 2 e) so we can compute MRSfrom knowing the utility function F. Example 1. take a bus or take a car to work? 2. letx1be the time of taking a car, y1be the time of taking a bus. Let x2 be cost of car, etc. 3. supposeutilityfunctiontakeslinearform U(x1,...,x n)=β 1x1+...+βnxn 4. we can observe a number of choices and use statistical techniques to estimate the parameters βithat best describe choices 5. one study that did this could forecast the actual choice over 93% of the time 6. once we have the utility function we can do many things with it: a) calculate the marginal rate of substitution between two characteristics 1) how much money would the average consumer give up in order to get a shorter travel time? b) forecast consumer response to proposed changes c) estimate whether proposed change is worthwhile in a benefit-cost senseChapter 5 13 Chapter 5 Choice This is the chapter where we bring it all together. Make sure that students understand the methodof maximization and don’t just memorize the various special cases. The problems in the workbook are designed to show the futility of memorizing special cases, but often students try it anyway. The material in Section 5.4 is very important—I introduce it by saying “Why should you carethat the MRSequals the price ratio?” The answer is that this allows economists to determine something about peoples’ trade-offs by observing market prices. Thus it allows for the possibility of benefit-cost analysis. The material in Section 5.5 on choosing taxes is the first big non-obvious result from using consumer theory ideas. I go over it very carefully, to makesure that students understand the result, and emphasize how this analysisuses the techniques that we’ve developed. Pound home the idea that the analytictechniquesofmicroeconomicshaveabigpayoff—theyallowustoanswer questions that we wouldn’t have been able to answer without these techniques. If you are doing a calculus-based course, be sure to spend some time on the appendix to this chapter. Emphasize that to solve a constrained maximizationproblem, you must have two equations. One equation is the constraint, and one equation is the optimization condition. I usually work a Cobb-Douglas and a perfect complements problem to illustrate this. In the Cobb-Douglas case, theoptimization condition is that the MRSequals the price ratio. In the perfect complements case, the optimization condition is that the consumer chooses abundle at the corner. Choice A. Optimal choice 1. move along the budget line until preferred set doesn’t cross the budget set. Figure 5.1. 2. note that tangency occurs at optimal point — necessary condition for optimum. In symbols: MRS=−price ratio = −p 1/p2. a) exception — kinky tastes. Figure 5.2. b) exception — boundary optimum. Figure 5.3. 3. tangency is not sufficient. Figure 5.4. a) unless indifference curves are convex.14Chapter Highlights b) unless optimum is interior. 4. optimal choice is demanded bundle a) as we vary prices and income, we get demand functions. b) want to study how optimal choice — the demanded bundle – changes as price and income change B. Examples 1. perfect substitutes: x1=m/p 1ifp1<p 2; 0 otherwise. Figure 5.5. 2. perfect complements: x1=m/(p1+p2). Figure 5.6. 3. neutrals and bads: x1=m/p 1. 4. discrete goods. Figure 5.7. a) suppose good is either consumed or not b) then compare (1 ,m−p1)w i t h( 0 ,m) and see which is better. 5. concave preferences: similar to perfect substitutes. Note that tangency doesn’t work. Figure 5.8. 6. Cobb-Douglas preferences: x1=am/p 1. Note constant budget shares, a= budget share of good 1. C. Estimating utility function 1. examine consumption data 2. see if you can “fit” a utility function to it 3. e.g., if income shares are more or less constant, Cobb-Douglas does a good job 4. can use the fitted utility function as guide to policy decisions 5. in real life more complicated forms are used, but basic idea is the same D. Implications of MRScondition 1. why do we care that MRS=−price ratio? 2. ifeveryonefacesthesameprices, theneveryonehasthesamelocaltrade-off between the two goods. This is independent of income and tastes. 3. since everyone locally values the trade-off the same, we can make policy judgments. Isitworthsacrificingonegoodtogetmoreoftheother? Prices serve as a guide to relative marginal valuations. E.Application—choosingatax. Whichisbetter, acommoditytaxoranincome tax? 1. can show an income tax is always better in the sense that given any commodity tax, there is an income tax that makes the consumer betteroff. Figure 5.9. 2. outline of argument: a) original budget constraint: p 1x1+p2x2=m b) budget constraint with tax: ( p1+t)x1+p2x2=m c) optimal choice with tax: (p 1+t)x∗ 1+p2x∗2=m d) revenue raised is tx∗ 1 e) income tax that raises same amount of revenue leads to budget con- straint:p1x1+p2x2=m−tx∗ 1 1) this line has same slope as original budget line 2) also passes through ( x∗ 1,x∗2) 3) proof: p1x∗1+p2x∗2=m−tx∗1 4) this means that ( x∗ 1,x∗2) is affordable under the income tax, so the optimal choice under the income tax must be even better than (x∗ 1,x∗2) 3. caveats a) only applies for one consumer — for each consumer there is an income tax that is better